Suspicious voting behavior reporting thread

Posted in

#251 by prieto-kun
2021-07-16 at 01:50
< report >My bad, I just saw #1.
#252 by gambsgambs
2021-07-31 at 10:56
< report >u189910 voted on Soukou Akki Muramasa despite it being on their wishlist, and wrote as a note "I wish for this every single day" -- i.e. they voted on it despite having read none of it
#253 by historyeraser
2021-08-03 at 17:44
< report >u127932 gave DDLC a 7 hours to finish score, which is blatantly wrong.
#254 by jazz957
2021-08-03 at 18:26
< report >I mean it's a vote of how long it took them, so it can't be wrong.
#255 by historyeraser
2021-08-03 at 18:27
< report >Ok, so if I went on the page for any generic shitpost OELVN that takes 5 minutes to finish, and I said it takes 20 hours to finish, then it's not vandalism/a troll vote?
#256 by cubky
2021-08-03 at 18:30
< report >And so it begins...
#257 by jazz957
2021-08-03 at 18:33
< report >That would definitely be a troll vote, but DDLC clearly isn't that case.
#258 by npzmzfg
2021-08-03 at 18:59
< report >If you check then you'll see that 7 hours isn't unusual for people playing DDLC+, since it adds additional content to the game. And that is the version that u127932 played. Not to mention that the median completionist time for the original DDLC is 7.5 hours, so it'd be within reason even if they hadn't played DDLC+. There is simply no reason to label their vote a "troll vote".
#259 by historyeraser
2021-08-03 at 19:19
< report >Oh, I based my off vote off the original version and the time required to get all endings in that release. Gomen.
#260 by takayanagi
2021-08-03 at 19:32
< report >About reason #1, there's a chance people will do it without any malice, thinking vndb allows these pre-release votes as a way to "gauge interest".

It's not unreasonable to assume there's something in place for this, like anidb has separate temp and permanent voting.


You must be logged in to reply to this thread.