Posted in

#1 by fhc
2019-08-31 at 17:42
I am using Textractor but the game freeze Translator Aggregator when show up options to choose, I should prefer to play it on ITHVNR but need HCODE.
#2 by bobjr2000
2019-08-31 at 18:08
does it freeze when using Text built in translator?
#3 by fhc
2019-08-31 at 19:51
@bobjr2000 I am sorry I not understand your question, I am using textractor:


But when show up options it freeze translator aggregator, I believe that is because happens a very high repetition that texttractor block the repetition from to show up in textrreactor windows but it SEND to clipboard the repetition and this repetition freeze translator aggregator and I need to close and reopen it again. is pretty boring to do it all the time, since in the begging of the game show up several options to choose.Last modified on 2019-09-02 at 01:55
#4 by bobjr2000
2019-08-31 at 21:47
Still not sure why using TA unless its a preference. Just played game using Textractor and had no crashing. That being said the hook seemed to be backwards with first line being second, don't know how much that affects translation so might still need a /h code.

Sorry don't have a hook code but should be able to still hook game to text without crashing, just don't use TA as your translator. Text comes with its own box that auto clips to.
#5 by fhc
2019-09-01 at 00:21
Is because I like to use bing, google and yandex at same time. most of the time yandex is very bad, but sometimes is the best, specially that yandex handle verbs conjugations much better than google and bing, but, google is better in text concordance while bing identify some nouns that google not recognize.

Really, using Yandex, Bing and google at same time and comparing the 3 translation you get a 100% understanding of the text, but, only translation aggregator can use the 3 at same time.

see a example:

linkLast modified on 2019-09-02 at 01:55
#6 by bobjr2000
2019-09-01 at 13:32
I get it, just don't get why you end on

you get it?

Can't tell if it weird writing habit or just trying to insult person.
#7 by fhc
2019-09-02 at 01:55
There is absolutely no desire to insult, my english is just bad and I want to be sure that you can understand me. I not sure If I am writing correctly... I am sorry, from on go on I will try to avoid to write it. in old times I was always writing " my english is bad and I hope you can understand me", but I am too lazy to write it.Last modified on 2019-09-02 at 01:59
#8 by isalkeren
2019-09-07 at 20:33
The h-code : /HQ4@63610:matchingm.exe
#9 by fhc
2019-09-10 at 23:05
Thank you very much, isalkeren
#10 by fuukanou
2019-09-10 at 23:53
I'm impressed you even get anything out of that MT, it's completely wrong and doesn't convey anything the original line in the screenshot is saying lol

"Wha--!? You're telling me to do [it] with this dude who doesn't look like he's going to get anywhere in life!? No way, no way, he's just going to get in the way"

I can't imagine playing one scene relying on it, forget a whole gameLast modified on 2019-09-10 at 23:55
#11 by ramaladni
2019-09-11 at 03:56
#10 Well, I was going to refrain from commenting, but here goes. This is obviously directed to the OP.

Straying aside from the usual "MTL bad" argument, here's why having five machine translations is awful: more doesn't exactly mean better. You could piece the fragments of the different translations and make a coherent sentence, but without knowledge of the original Japanese, how are you going to be able to do that accurately? Go with what sounds better? What if all five are wrong?

Not to mention that five times the translators equals five times the headaches and time taken reading...

You can keep doing this, but it's really ignorant to assume you understand the intended meaning "100%", and disingenuous to trick others into believing that. But whatever floats your boat, dude.
#12 by tomtheerogeman
2019-09-11 at 04:31
I remember the company behind LEC loved to boast about how good their machine translations are. I laughed once I saw the screenshot.


You must be logged in to reply to this thread.