| #1 by abyssaleros 2011-06-10 at 07:38 | < report >Hi there, I would vote to separate r9093 and r9094 into 2 single VN and make alternative versions of one another. As of now the releases seem a bit of a mess for my understanding, so a separation seems fine for me. But what is the opinion someone who had played the different releases? |
| #2 by abyssaleros 2011-06-10 at 12:00 | < report >So here it comes along the mess I was talking about^^ r12431 does include r9094 - thats fact. I have (r12431.2) deleted the relation with Mahou Shoujo Ai, 'cause it is not included. immlff (r12431.3) has reverted it, and from his position rightly so - that's even a fact. That's because I haven't thought in that moment about the mess with the original and the plus versions. So I would vote for a separation.Last modified on 2011-06-10 at 12:00 |
| #3 by eyeless 2011-06-10 at 12:06 | < report >According to getchu, Ai+ have: additional CGs, additional endings, revised scenario (so that new character routes can be added). Main plot is still the same, so basically it is the same game with more content, not an alternative version. |
| #4 by Yorhel 2011-06-10 at 12:06 | < report >Uhm, so you're voting to have a separate VN entry for the non-Plus and the Plus versions? What's the difference between r9093 and r9094, exactly? EDIT: ah, eyeless was faster. Sounds like a similar case to v5, which we've kept as a single VN entry.Last modified on 2011-06-10 at 12:08 |
| #5 by abyssaleros 2011-06-10 at 12:37 | < report >Okay, v5 is the same case, so it shall be a single VN entry. I have checked Getchu and Colors and eyeless has a point there. Strangely I thought this morning from a look on Colors-page and Erogamescape the difference between them was far greater. Sry for bothering you. |
| #6 by immlff 2011-06-10 at 12:47 | < report >One slightly offtopic remark: there was no need to create two separate threads for this. You could've just made one thread and linked it to to both vn entries.Last modified on 1970-01-01 at 00:00 |
| #7 by abyssaleros 2011-06-10 at 12:59 | < report >@ immlff - I will do better in future. (Still need a lot to comprehend of the structure - that's why I have asked before doing some damage to the database on my own faultiness) |
Reply
You must be logged in to reply to this thread.