|#201 by takata|
2016-01-28 at 04:36
|< report >Missionary - butterfly link broken, should be link|
|#202 by anonymous|
2016-01-31 at 23:22
|< report >on the main page,|
hovering over a country flag on just released stuff displays a hashcode rather then the countryLast modified on 2016-01-31 at 23:25
|#203 by eacil|
2016-02-12 at 01:03
|< report >Please make the dash (-) equal to a space because, for some reason, I can't stop myself to type Clock-Up and get no result, or Pin Point when the search engine is too strict and ask for Pin-Point.|
|#204 by beliar|
2016-02-12 at 19:45
|< report >I wonder how no one has reported it yet. In character edit form, character type box (protagonist/main/side) is for some reason blank. It's impossible to determine which type you choose. Relevant pic.|
|#205 by yorhel|
2016-02-12 at 20:16
|< report >I broke that a few hours ago and sneakily fixed it about 20 minutes later. The fix requires a good refresh, however. Shift+F5 should do the trick.|
|#206 by eacil|
2016-03-04 at 00:53
|< report >Really long character names are screwing the layout and even adding an horizontal scrollbar to the box.|
The scrollbar appears for Sengoku † Koihime ~Otome Kenran ☆ Sengoku Emaki~ in 1600x900 when there are four columns. Below, the overflow is not handled with names overlapping their status.
Handling user input is the pleasure of every web designer.
|#207 by eacil|
2016-03-08 at 22:46
|< report >When you write a v[ID] code in the note field of a release, like link, the code is not formatted as in the discussion board with the name appearing instead of the code itself.|
I don't know if it's the only place but maybe producer/character/staff/etc editors are suffering from the same error. I do remember having troubles with that, forced to format the url myself but I never thought of reporting that until I saw it happened to u74686. (<<It would nice to apply that to users too.)
Edit: what about link ;_;Last modified on 2016-03-08 at 22:51
|#208 by savagetiger|
2016-04-04 at 04:19
|< report >The character search isn't parsing spaces correctly.|
like searching for ニ宮真琴 won't bring up Ninomiya Makoto.
|#209 by eacil|
2016-08-31 at 22:04
|< report >When you specify wrong multiple boards for a thread, it gives you a server internal error instead of explaining you that you linked the same board twice.|
|#210 by eacil|
2017-01-23 at 09:57
|< report >I discovered vndb is using that db I never heard about before, NFO/animenfo, and all the links I tried are dead.|
|#211 by yorhel|
2017-01-25 at 08:08
|< report >|
When you specify wrong multiple boards for a thread, it gives you a server internal error instead of explaining you that you linked the same board twice.Ultra-late, but fixed by automatically removing duplicate boards.
I discovered vndb is using that db I never heard about before, NFO/animenfo, and all the links I tried are dead.AnimeNFO used to be the main anime database before AniDB was created. Which is a looooong time ago. But indeed the links stopped working for some reason, so I've hidden them for now.
|#212 by tyr|
2017-01-25 at 10:11
|< report >When a release is moved to another vn entry and a user has marked this release as owned, the new vn will not be marked as unknown for the user automatically, so will the old vn not be removed from the user's vnlist.|
As far as I see, owning a release of a vn while not having this vn on your vnlist is a state that should never be possible.
I noticed this when the Majikoi A releases were moved to new separate pages.
|#213 by wakaranai|
2017-02-28 at 18:06
|< report >t3314.1032 unapproved and deleted traits could be added to characters if specified directly with iNNN format. seems like an oversight in character edit code.|
will it break anything if traitxml function returns approved traits only? although it still could be bypassed then by manual meddling with character form data, so more thorough check might be required.
|#214 by yorhel|
2017-03-03 at 09:59
|< report >@213: fixed. Deleted and unapproved traits now can not be selected and will be silently removed when editing. I was surprised by the lack of validation at the back end, but fortunately postres would disallow dangling references anyway.|
While i was at it i also ran a script to remove all existing trait links to deleted/unapproved traits. See u1 edits for the list.Last modified on 2017-03-03 at 09:59
|#215 by wakaranai|
2017-03-05 at 02:18
|< report >^after this update editing character without traits causes internal server error 500.|
|#216 by yorhel|
2017-03-05 at 06:39
|< report >I'm proud of my ability to screw something up even when making the tiniest changes.|
|#217 by tyrog|
2017-03-25 at 08:23
|< report >There is a typo in the editing guidelines - at the bottom of the page where it says "illigal" it should be "illegal". This has been left there for how many years now?|
Anyway, it should be fixed.
|#218 by barfboy|
2017-04-19 at 00:02
|< report >Not all rapists are boys.|
Can Rape by Proxy be fixed to say 'he or she'?
|#219 by sakurakoi|
2017-04-19 at 04:51
|< report >|
Not all rapists are boys.
India disagrees... along with a bunch of psycho- and sociopaths, also to be precisely usually one is talking about wermen only being able to rape (not just boys/male servants or actually like it is, all men/human beings)
Seriously though, it's not even direct rape but as it says, having one force another to perform sexual acts or rather intercourse with someone else (this trait rather is sexual assault by proxy) and a kind of blackmail.
Also, it ain't "he or she" but simply "they". "They" is a very handy pronoun which can even include a single entity/character with whatever and without any sex (and not just a group of something).
|#220 by barfboy|
2017-04-20 at 04:15
|< report >I swear to god that was a 'he' yesterday. Was I tired?|
|#221 by sakurakoi|
2017-04-20 at 05:13
|< report >|
I swear to god that was a 'he' yesterday. Was I tired?Nope, it was simply fixed. Traits and Tags merely lack a (public) history tab since only moderators and higher can change them...
unless there is some secret system which allows experienced/proven/recognized/whatever users to do (and view) as well, I wouldn't know~
|#222 by shinnew|
2017-06-04 at 19:12
|< report >The filter "All except characters" in the user edit history page also hides edits to staff entries, not just characters.|
|#223 by yorhel|
2017-06-05 at 05:40
|< report >@222: Fixed.|
|#224 by bunny1ov3r|
2017-06-05 at 05:45
|< report >I did write a long criticism on the choice of "they", but after some research apparently it is fine in this case? Still reads really weird though, especially because "they" is still followed by "are".|
Wouldn't a easier way be just to write "this character" again, to avoid all this weirdness?Last modified on 2017-06-05 at 05:54
|#225 by beliar|
2017-06-05 at 06:07
|< report >There is nothing weird about this. "They are" can refer either to a group of characters or a singular character when we don't want to define the gender. It reads much better than writing "he or she".|