Summaries

Posted in

#1 by thewayfarer
2017-10-18 at 10:11
< report >Well, here we are again. My fourth post to you. This time: In response to your uh...recent endeavors.

I've been keeping an eye on some upcoming English releases that caught my eye on. Even the rumored "Nekopara Vol. 4." Waiting to see if the Neko Works are actually continuing the series. I'm also subscribed to Email blog posts of Sekai Project for their publications of their games. I'm most hyped to see if calme will continue the KARAKARA series. I've yet to subscribe to updates for MangaGamer and Nutaku, for any of the releases too.

As a community encyclopedia enthusiast, it's my community right to *help* contribute information to solidify with solid infomration. I am also willing to spend like half an hour filling character sheets with lots of detail. And most of all, I state my reason doing so, with *edit summaries*. Whether they're just only created pages, I always detail my contributions to the fullest, and even source my contributions that could be considered 'trivial'.

Of course, I can't check if there will be any "new Japanese releases" because I don't know how to speak or read Japanese. But what I *can* do, is finish what they started. Even if they...placed them in effortlessly.

So in response how you are being snarky with me recently, is about your lack of summaries. Summarizing is there for either two purposes: Solidify and detailing our contributions. Unlike everyone, you are the only one who 'never' source your contributions. Empty reasons like that, create lots of unanswered questions. Anybody can question lack of reason: "What purpose is for creating this character?" "Where did this contributor get this from?" "Does it deserve a place in the encyclopedia database?" Empty summary habits like that can start a debate. That even goes with your attitude: You wait until someone challenges your contribution because you never state your contributions. Then later you 'correct it', then brag to the person who was "wrong" with a surprise source that you WITHELD, or perhaps just got the information and just want to inflate your own ego.

If you think it's coincidence that I'm preying on your contributions like a panther, you're just only corrupting yourself with idealism. Because I'm seeing no summaries (because of you) and sources in the history, I'm only confirming myself if the release/game has proof. Blog posts, twitter, online searching. Those are my methods to whether the topic I'm investigating, is confirmed true. If not, then I must weigh the substantial and theories. If that still doesn't reach a conclusion, then it's not true and I must take it to the higher ups. If you want to solidify your contributions, then you must weigh between the substantial and trivial, and learn how to use the edit summary. How hard is it to waste 30 seconds writing a short sentence? That's something everyone can do in primary school. Is a few seconds too long for you? Maybe even ONE second, of your life?

Seriously, you're becoming like weilai.
#2 by 707
2017-10-18 at 10:58
< report >So first is about "why did you downvote my tag?!", then silhouette is better than not-scanned image, third is summary. Wonder what's our next nice conversation is gonna be.

Well, I usually give summaries too, you know. It just happens that you're hyping at stuffs with ".." on edit summary (even though the image stated the proof... well except Monmusu because it doesn't need to be changed). But next time, I'll make sure I always write summaries later if it requires a proof, for people like you.

But here's a thing: when you don't know whether a thing is true or not, you can't just "I don't know this. I can't look for a proof. I revert this back." There's a lot of VNDB contributors and people that "don't sources in summary" are many. What I did is not revert them back, but look for the sources myself.

I can understand that you can't search for Japanese sources, but before "Dream Daddy," you couldn't look for English sources too, did you? So next time, maybe you can ask me for source so I can look it for you.

BTW, who's weilai? What he did?
#3 by thewayfarer
2017-10-18 at 21:33
< report >
Well, I usually give summaries too, you know. It just happens that you're hyping at stuffs with ".." on edit summary (even though the image stated the proof... well except Monmusu because it doesn't need to be changed). But next time, I'll make sure I always write summaries later if it requires a proof, for people like you.
Don't expect everyone can find the "source" just by the image that's already there. Like I said: Use edit summaries and source your information, which you did not at all.

But here's a thing: when you don't know whether a thing is true or not, you can't just "I don't know this. I can't look for a proof. I revert this back." There's a lot of VNDB contributors and people that "don't sources in summary" are many. What I did is not revert them back, but look for the sources myself.
So you admit that you DIDN'T had the source before you contributed your releases?

I can understand that you can't search for Japanese sources, but before "Dream Daddy," you couldn't look for English sources too, did you? So next time, maybe you can ask me for source so I can look it for you.
It appears you did not get what I meant by "that caught my eye on."

BTW, who's weilai? What he did?
Just like you said how I didn't "check", YOU should check him out too.
#4 by 707
2017-10-19 at 04:53
< report >Since I don't know how to blockquote:

1. Ya, that's why I said I will source for people like you.
2. ? I don't know how you get that conclusion. Read this again " There's a lot of VNDB contributors and PEOPLE that "don't sources in summary" are many. What I did is not revert them back, but look for the sources myself." Tell me if you don't understand, okay?
3. No, mind to explain?
4. Why? I don't care about other people like you do. I'm asking you nicely and if you want to share some gossip with me. If you don't want, that's okay~

Hmm can we stop now? We have the same stuff to agree now: we hate each other. Let's pretend we never met, okay?
#5 by thewayfarer
2017-10-19 at 07:12
< report >Sigh. I say what about you what's wrong, you refuse to admit it. And when you say you'd do something, you don't put any honesty in your response. And when someone show you proof, you never want to see for it yourself. This is *ignorance*. You're just too stubborn just to see what is wrong with you based on the views of other people.

This topic only started all because of your recent summaries are blantly directed towards me. The lack of free compassion would only antagonize everyone around you if anti-social habits like that continues.
#6 by 707
2017-10-19 at 07:23
< report >"(PS: Learn how to source and summary from where you got your information.)"

What a nice summary YOU blatantly directed toward me.

Because I thought we're perfectly fine after the last thread.

I really don't know what's really your problem this time. I said I will source from now on because I now know why you can't look for some sources. And you be like, rude.

PLEASE don't ever talk to me again. Bye.
#7 by thewayfarer
2017-10-19 at 08:03
< report >...You need serious help.Last modified on 2017-10-19 at 08:04
#8 by 707
2017-10-19 at 08:33
< report >Okay lol

Reply

You must be logged in to reply to this thread.